Posts

The Wreck of the William Brown: A True Tale of Overcrowded Lifeboats and Murder at Sea, by Tom Koch (International Marine/McGraw-Hill 2004)

Image
The Wreck of the William Brown by Tom Koch Book Review by Eric Fryar On March 18, 1841, the William Brown under the command of Captain George Harris sailed from Liverpool, England for Philadelphia, with a crew of 17, a cargo primarily of salt, and 66 passengers, mostly poor Scottish and Irish emigrants in steerage. At about 10pm on April 19, the ship plowed into an iceberg in the North Atlantic, about 250 miles southeast of Newfoundland—the same waters where the Titanic would go down for the same reason 71 years later.  Captain Harris, who had ordered the ship to sail at full speed without a lookout posted, did not go down with the ship. He and eight sailors and one passenger got into the jolly boat. The first mate with eight sailors and 36 passengers got into the longboat. They left 29 passengers, many of them children, to die on the sinking vessel. None of the crew was lost. The next morning, Captain Harris abandoned the longboat and made for Newfoundland. The jolly boat was not ove

Mutiny on the Ulysses: Part 3-Trial of the Ulysses Mutineers

Image
  Mutiny on the Ulysses Historical Trial Series by Eric Fryar Part 3: Trial of the  Ulysses Mutineers In 1800, federal authorities tried five sailors for mutiny in one of the most famous trials of its day. In a virtual replay of the Mutiny on the Bounty, the sailors claimed that they had acted in self-defense against the abuse and murderous threats by the captain. On both sides of this high-profile case were the best lawyers in the county. Would the sailors hang?  This is an excerpt from a forthcoming book by Eric Fryar. Opening Statement for the Prosecution The government then proceeded with its opening statement. The official case report says nothing of the opening statements for either side, but these would also have been short and simple. Attorneys were not permitted to argue their case in opening or to go into great detail about the facts. The purpose of the opening was to give the jury a short roadmap of what was expected to be proven and what evidence would be presented. It was